Welcome to Chinese-forums.com
Since 2003 we've been helping people learn Chinese, study and work in China, find Chinese books, movies or music. We are active, friendly and helpful. Check out recent and popular posts on the home page, see the full forums listing or sign up for free now.
"This forum is a goldmine of information, and I'm so glad it's here!"
"...the kindest, most interesting and most useful help."
Anyone Taken the HSK Advanced
Posted 22 June 2005 - 08:10 PM
I've done the Elementary / Intermediate Exam twice, last time coming out with a 7 (8's in everything but 综合, and if I had got 3 (THREE!!! ) more points there I would have had an 8 overall.
The obvious issue is that for the Advanced you really do need to learn to write. I have my doubts about this.
Do we have anyone on the board who has done the advanced, or is looking at doing it?
Site SponsorsPleco for iPhone / Android iPhone & Android Chinese dictionary: camera & hand- writing input, flashcards, audio.
Study Chinese in Kunming 1-1 classes, qualified teachers and unique teaching methods in the Spring City.
Learn Mandarin in Beijing Tailored, intensive classes from professional teachers, for real results. Business Chinese
Learn Chinese in China Learn to speak Chinese 1MonthChinese.com -Mandarin School in China.
Learn Chinese Characters Learn 2289 Chinese Characters in 90 Days with a Unique Flash Card System.
The Hutong School in China Learn Chinese, intern or volunteer in Beijing, Shanghai and Chengdu with the Hutong School.
Popup Chinese Translator Understand Chinese inside any Windows application, website or PDF.
Chinese Grammar Wiki All Chinese grammar, organised by level, all in one place.
Put your message here
Posted 23 June 2005 - 01:14 AM
I also would like to try taking the Advanced version after moving to Austin, Texas (USA) this July. I want to ask, do you get a certificate for completing each exam level? There's just three exam levels, right?
Posted 23 June 2005 - 01:21 AM
Ok, you get two things. One is a 成绩单 - transcript, I guess. This states your individual scores on each part of the test and explains how the final grade is reached (by, for example, making a big fuss about a measly three marks in the 综合 section)
The other is the 证书, which is the pretty thing you put on the wall. This just gives you the Grade (ie B at Intermediate Level) and doesn't mention the 6's and 7's and 8's which people tend to talk about when discussing HSK levels.
There are three separate HSK levels (foundation / elementary + intermediate / advanced), and you'd get a certificate for all of them (assuming you reach a passing grade, I suppose)
Posted 23 June 2005 - 10:39 AM
Posted 23 June 2005 - 03:07 PM
He did have a prep text that he used that he got from one of the colleges in Beijing.
I might take it someday, after I retire and learn how to write characters longhand. But wait, I'm not going to retire until I'm cripple and can't hardly do anything. Maybe I won't ever take it. I can write my name, that's good enough.
Posted 23 June 2005 - 07:23 PM
I haven't got the result yet (they say within two months) but am fairly sure I've passed.
I organised a study group (had mostly Koreans, 8 people. I was the only white person - am Aussie) through my tutor for the exact same reason as you - I needed a goal. I had a ball in the process.
I actually won't care that much about the result since I learnt SO much preparing (for 3 months) that it is worth it anyway. I haven't taken the elementary or intermediate tests but we did lots of practice tests which made the actual test taking easier.
I'm not here studying, I'm working. But came to imrove my Chinese. I would strongly suggest a private tutor or small classes.
Posted 24 June 2005 - 02:02 PM
A Chinese teacher of mine told me something interesting about the Advanced HSK. He said that in the past couple of years, he had seen a few students who had scored an overall 7 on the intermediate exam turn right around and get a 9 or 10 on the Advanced just a few months later. That should not happen. There is supposed to be a pretty big gap between 8 and 9. Hanban describes an 8 as someone who has received about 2000 hours of instruction. A 9 would usually have had about 3000 hours of instruction. Sure, quality of instruction matters more than total number of hours, but there is still a big gap. Anyway, this teacher thought he knew why these students were only gettting 7's on the intermediate and then getting 9's on the Advanced without a lot of exam preparation for the latter. The elementary-intermediate exam is a norms referenced exam. That means they expect that a certain percentage of people will get each level of the exam every time the exam is offered. The result is that if you got 79 percent for a part of the test (which should be a 7), but hardly anybody else got much better than you on that part, then your score will likely be adjusted up into the 8 bracket. If their curve says that 5% of test takers should get an 8 for each part, but only 3 percent of examinees got a raw score that fell into the 8 bracket, then they will lower the the minimum score for that bracket until they get their 5%. To a certain extent, you are testing against other people who are taking the exam in the same sitting and doing the same version. They occasionally use a portion of the exam more than once just to get an idea of whether performance on that part is consistent among different groups of examinees at different sittings. This is not a perfect system, but it is cheap. It can, however, mean that someone who just missed an 8 could quite possibly score a very strong 8 the next month.
The speaking and writing parts of the Advanced exam are criterion referenced rather than norm referenced. That means there is no curve. Criterion referenced exams like the HSK, IELTS or Cambridge CAE have detailed marking guidelines with descriptors for each level. It costs more to run this sort of exam since markers require a much higher level of training and there is a need for extensive moderation. Theoretically, a 9 in 1996 should be a 9 today, whereas a student who got an 8 in May, 1996 might not be any better in real ability than someone who got a 7 in July of the same year.
Back to why students who just scored a 7 can sometimes turn around and get a 9. Unless it has changed just recently, there are 3 or 4 sittings for the elementary-intermediate HSK in the PRC each year. Hong Kong, Macau and foreign testing sites may hold the exam a couple of times a year. However, the advanced exam is only held once a year in the PRC. I believe that it's in May. Foreign testing sites only offer it once a year, if at all. Even for graduate study, unless they are planning to study Chinese lit or history, most people usually don't need an advanced level score. A lot of very proficient users of Chinese choose to just do the elementary-intermediate exam because:
1. They don't need an advanced score
2. With its multiple sittings, the elementary-intermediate exam is more convenient
3. There is a gap between an 8 and a 9 and some people are afraid they aren't quite good enough to jump that gap yet. This combined with the fact that if you don't make the minimum score for a 9, you don't get a certificate with a grade. If someone needs an HSK cert and doesn't have time to take it twice, they may just decide to be safe and take the elementary-intermediate.
The result is that there are more and more advanced students taking the intermediate exam and pushing the curve up. It could very well be harder to get an 8 than a 9. I don't know if the distortion is really that big, but it seems to me that this teacher's reasoning could be correct. In my opinion, the kind of person who is able to quickly jump the gap between a 7 or 8 and a 9 would:
1. Be strong in language skills but not very well honed on exam skills. Perhaps they didn't really do many practice papers before doing the elementary-intermediate. Since the advanced exam has a lot more subjective tasks, the student with good language skills but poor testing skills may be able to do better on it than the multiple choice, fill in the blank intermediate exam.
2. Have taken the intermediate exam in a sitting that happened to have more smart people taking it than usual. Some people have stated before in these forums that it is harder to score a good grade in the July sitting for the HSK because there are a lot of minority examinees doing it then. I don't know whether or not there is one sitting of the HSK that attracts more minorities or if those minorities are even good enough to drive the curve up, but the chance of the curve being driven upward because an unusually large number of smart people took the exam is certainly there.
Posted 24 June 2005 - 02:21 PM
There's an Advanced exam in October, which is a bit sooner than I'd like - December is much more comfortably distant.
Posted 24 June 2005 - 03:08 PM
Nice link. I haven't looked at the mock exams recently, but if memory serves, some of the fill in the blank parts of the advanced exam are different from the elem-int. exam. In the elem-int. exam, there is only character gap fill. I remember that for the advanced exam, at least for the reading, the fill in the blank part is a subjective short answer format. The marker will usually have a list of acceptable answers for each blank, and sometimes answers that aren't on the list but display an acceptable level of comprehension will be accepted. At least that's the way it works for exams like IELTS, CAE or CEP. Unlike a multiple choice or single character gap fill question, these short answer questions require more interpretation from the reader and a bit of language production.
The advanced test has been available twice a year on many occaisons, including this year.
You also have multiple choice and fill in the blanks in the advanced test.
More info can he found here.
You people have got me curious about this exam again. I've done practice papers for it before and found most sections ok. The biggest difficulty for me was the writing. For me, 400 characters in 30 minutes is a lot. Some of the prep books I've looked at didn't provide much context for the writing tasks. For example, a sample paper will say something like "apply to XYZ company for a job" without really telling you anything about XYZ company or what job you should apply for. That leads to the writer being tested on non-linguistic knowledge, which is pretty unfair. At least one of the BLCU books I've got seems to provide good context for the writing task. Does anybody know if the real exam provides good context for the writing part?
I have a prep book for the writing section that I like: HSK Kaoqian Qianghua-Xiezuo (BLCUP, 2004)(sorry, no Chinese input on this computer). The ISBN is 7-5619-1330-3/H.04036. It provides good practice for different genres of writing. I haven't been preparing for the HSK Advanced, but I've found this book helpful for improving my writing.
Posted 03 July 2005 - 07:34 PM
I'm thinking of taking the advanced test next year.
I don't think it would be that fun, though. I've also heard before that HSK certificates are only good for a few years, and they 'expire'. Can anyone confirm that?
Posted 04 July 2005 - 07:12 PM
It was my first time taking any HSK whatsoever, so I'm not qualified to say how it is in comparison to the Intermediate, but I can give some impressions from a first time test taker.
I would strongly suggest taking a couple of timed mock tests before the real test and get familiar with the test format (particularly the listening) before the actual test. I did one timed mock test at home about 4 months before I took the real test, and if I hadn't done that I would probably not have passed the real one. I took my test at 2 Wai, and the test officiating was pretty poor. The test monitor did not tell us that we were to open our testing materials, or that the actual test had started. She messed up the timing on the spoken section so badly that they had to repeat it after all the students had recorded once. This is obviously horribly unfair to all the other students taking the test, who only got to record once. Since I was only taking the test for fun, I only recorded once.
Aside from the officiating, here are a couple of random thoughts about the rest of the test, which I'll sort by section:
1.) Listening: This is the section that I've heard from my former Chinese teachers murders folks who are great students of Chinese, but haven't lived in China for very long. Questions often center around extremely colloquial expressions, and if you haven't been here long enough to understand what "乔迁之喜" means the first time its spoken in a rapid fire conversation, then you're gonna have serious trouble. Additionally, no one told me that the passages are recorded at native-speaker pace, sound as if they were done over the telephone, and are only played once. I 'bout near panicked when I heard the first passage, which was all about Crane migration. I didn't know the word for "crane" or "migration." I'm still puzzled about how I got a middling C score on this section, I thought that the number of questions I left blank almost disqualified me from passing the test altogether.
2.) Reading: As a professional translator with a year of full-time experience under my belt, I thought this was the section that I would beat like the proverbial redheaded stepchild. Instead, it was the only section that I failed to get a C score in (but you're allowed to get a C certificate if you don't go below a certain lower limit on one section.) Unless you're a native reader, you absolutely CANNOT waste time reading the entire passage and then answer the questions. On the mock test I took, I tried this and got a 14%. I managed to raise my score to 51% on the actual test because I didn't bother trying to read through the passages. What it really tests is your ability to scan for information fast. It also tests your ability to answer questions with written sentences, not just to pick at multiple choice questions. The passages are very uneven in terms of difficulty, ranging from language learning textbook level to academic 古汉语 stuff, so it might pay to skim all the passages before you start, single out and do first the ones that you're most likely to be able to read in the first place, and cut your losses by leaving the harder for last if you're struggling for the C, as I was.
3.) Integrated Section: The biggest suggestion I have for this section is to get familiar with the kinds of questions they will be asking. One of the sections asks you to find the area of the sentence with the problem in it, and it can be daunting if you're not sure exactly what kind of problem you're 'sposed to be looking for. I was in a cold sweat for the first five minutes because I wasn't sure what kinds of grammar mistakes they were trying to throw at me, but I managed to calm down and get through it. This section was actually where my "reading" skills paid off. There was a "fill-in-the-blank" section where you had to know how to write characters that you can only really get right if you've read enough material to have a feel for commonly used written expressions. This was also the only section that I finished completely.
4.) Writing: I wrote the requisite number of characters, didn't quite finish, and I know I spelled several characters wrong. The topic was broad enough to allow you to write about almost anything that you wanted to. I also wrote with extremely simple grammar and almost no 成语 or fixed expressions. I got the minimum passing C score, so if passing is your goal I would say simple and organized is the way to go. I have a friend who claims to have gotten an A score by simply making no grammar mistakes and not trying anything flashy. I tend to think that this is good advice, but I'd love to hear other experiences as well.
5.) Spoken: Two sections - the first is a set paragraph that they ask you to read, the second is 2 short little speeches that you prepare. The topics were extremely broad again, someone you admire and why, and different ways of greeting people. I got lucky because I knew all the tones of the set paragraph cold and got through with hardly any stumbling. For the prepared speech I hit all the basic points I scribbled down quickly and fumbled along pretty incoherently after that until the tape ran out. Good planning of what you're going to say and a clear idea of how long you have would be key here. Probably on the strength of my tones I got a B score in this section.
In conclusion I'd say that the biggest factor in determining whether or not you will pass this test is your actual time on the ground in china, coupled with your reading ability (your ability to read fast, not your ability to understand something when time is no object.) My guess is that you're going to have a seriously difficult time passing this test if you've been in China for less than 3 years, at least one of which was full time language study.
If you've been in China for a long time, read well, and want not just to pass, but to get a high score, then I'd suggest really taking some time and study how to take the HSK itself. Looking back, I think I could probably have improved my score between 25 and 40 points if I was stone-cold familiar with the test format, and had strategies for tackling each section. Also the "creative" portions of the test were phrased so broadly that I don't think its inconceivable to come in with them already prepared in your head if you were psycho enough to do that.
I'm going back to school at Qinghua next year full time to really polish up my language skills and I'll take the advanced HSK once more next year to try and get a measure of my progress. My hope is that I can get an A-level if I push myself really hard. I'm not sure if this is a realistic goal or not, but I am dead sure that if I don't take a structure HSK prep course that I'm going to be seriously unlikely to get anything higher than a B or C.
Hope y'all found this helpful, I'd be really curious to hear other folks experiences as well.
Posted 04 July 2005 - 08:46 PM
I practised many many practice tests, all unde exam conditions and I honestly think this saved me!! I agree with all your points, I too wrote "easy" uncomplicated prose for the written section.
The spoken topic was easy (as in broad) but my tones suck!
Posted 05 July 2005 - 12:28 PM
My current feeling is that I should take it in October, but view it as a trial run for a 'real' attempt next year. The exam seems tailored to test my weak points, and I really would have to learn to write from scratch, not just in terms of characters, but sentences and paragraphs. The reading should be ok if I can work on my speed reading - I am much more used to sitting at a desk and being able to take my time with something.
However, my two previous HSK sittings should give me a good grounding in exam skills, which is good.
5 years, but none of those full-time or formal study. Does that count
you're going to have a seriously difficult time passing this test if you've been in China for less than 3 years, at least one of which was full time language study
Thanks again folks.
Posted 05 July 2005 - 10:17 PM
I don't think anyone can put a time limit like that, I know someone whose Chinese is better than mine and she failed because of the written section. I studied hard and specifically for the HSK. I think the more practice tests the better. I also bought and used ALL of the following books, and would recommend them all, particularly the ones in bold for the Gao Ji:
Brushing up your vocabulary for HSK 单词速记速练（高级篇 -下）
Brushing up your vocabulary for HSK 单词速记速练（高级篇 – 中）
Brushing up your vocabulary for HSK 单词速记速练（高级篇 –上）
Brushing up your vocabulary for HSK 单词速记速练（中级篇 -下）
Brushing up your vocabulary for HSK 单词速记速练（中级篇 –上）
Brushing up your vocabulary for HSK 单词速记速练（初级篇 -下）
Brushing up your vocabulary for HSK 单词速记速练（初级篇 –中）
Brushing up your vocabulary for HSK 单词速记速练（初级篇 –上）
HSK Kaoqian Qianghua - Xiezuo HSK考前强化-写作 （高等）
HSK Kaoqian Qianghua - Koushi HSK考前强化-口式（高等）
An Intensive Course of HSK (Advanced) 速成强化教程（高等）
An Intensive Course of HSK （Elementary and Intermediate） 速成强化教程 （处，中等）
Posted 22 April 2006 - 08:55 PM
After taking it, I highly doubt that I passed, and if not, the listening will be the major culprit, followed by the writing, speaking, grammar, and reading, in order of difficulty, in my opinion.
Posted 22 April 2006 - 11:36 PM
I may also take the Advanced in October. Trouble is I am too lazy to practise my writing. I enjoy reading and typing, but writing is just too.....painstaking. Congratulations to those who have passed. Do we have any Level 10s yet?
Its a shame the officiating was so lax at Waida. These kind of things can really devalue an examination. When I took the intermediate there were people with pieces of paper taking notes during the listening even though this was expressly forbidden - the examiners didn't care.
Posted 23 April 2006 - 06:23 AM
Apparently in Korea employers rate Level 8 HSK higher than Level 9. Level 10 is what they all aim for, and even if they have got Level 9 some of them still take the intermediate again for the all-important Level 8.
Interesting stuff. Because the HSK is graded on a curve, getting a level 8 just means that you are one of the best among the people taking it. Or more specifically:
A section score of HSK (Elementary-Intermediate) is a scale score with 50 as the score mean and 15 as the standard deviation, while the total score is a scale score with 200 as the score mean and 60 the standard deviation. These scores show the relative position of the candidate in a standard sample group. The table below helps to locate the relative position of a candidate in the whole group. The right column indicates the percentage occupied by those whose scores are lower than the corresponding scores in the standard HSK reference group. Therefore, as it shows, the total score of HSK (Elementary-Intermediate) is not simply an add-up of the section scores.
Level 8 337-400
So an 8 would be a little bit more than two standard deviations from the mean. If I hadn't stopped taking math in high school, I could probably figure out what % that would correspond to. Edit: It seem that an 8 means that you are in the top 1.5% of people taking the 初中.
On the other hand, it seems that to get a 9, you have to be in the middle of the pack, or slightly above, of the people taking the 高. So, in some ways, it does look easier to get a 9 than an 8. The only flaw in that theory, however, is the 高 is really a much, much harder test. Of course, it has a writing section and a speaking section, so that cuts off tons of people who are weak in those two areas. Also, because exams are written on paper, reading is the basic skill needed to do well on any HSK. I would guestimate that the reading speed needed for the 高 is probably double the speed of that of the 初中. Also, the 高 requires a much bigger vocab than the 初中.
Still, if someone gets a high 6 to low 8 on the practice tests, and if he/she has a solid skills base, it might be worth it to look at taking the 高 instead of the 初中．
Posted 26 April 2006 - 12:33 AM
By the way. When are we supposed to have the results?
Posted 26 April 2006 - 03:44 PM
It was too difficult. my weakest point is the 综合 part. especially the "find a mistake in the sentence" and "insert 汉字". the exam was way more difficult than I expected. I was taking HSK classes for around a month or so
I know I didn't do all that well on that section either. I also took the 初中 the next day. On that test, I felt like I did really well on the listening, reading and 综合, but bombed on the grammar. The lesson for me is very simple: study grammar. Don't just wing it.
was taking HSK classes for around a month or so, and the books they used had examples more simple than the actual exam, especially the 听力 part. so, well, yeah, i don't think i passed.
I'm glad someone else thought the listening was hard as hell!
According 全新HSK高等模拟考试题集(赵梦萱主编), published in 2005, the dialogues in question 1-25 of the listening section have been gotten rid of. And, "moreover, the listening materials used in the testing are longer in content and quicker in speech speed". Accoring to 中国汉语水平考试大纲 （高等）, "能听懂用普通话以正常语速或稍快语速进行的对话或讲话，语速大体为 180-260字／分．＂
So, for me at least, that means:
A) many of the listening skills or test taking skills obtained for the 初中 don't work on the 高.
be cautious about buying any mock tests or prep materials that aren't current. For example, I did fairly well on a mock listening that contained a lot of dialogues. On the test on 4/22, there were no dialogues in questions 1-25.
C) I need to listen to more quickly spoken news on a variety of subjects in order to get better.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users