bhchao Posted December 24, 2004 at 10:23 AM Report Share Posted December 24, 2004 at 10:23 AM Was 呂不韋 really the father of Qin Shi Huang? Qin Shi Huang's mother was a concubine to 呂不韋 and she gave birth to the future emperor shortly after 呂不韋 gave her away to the King of Qin. If this is true, then Qin Shi Huang would have committed a serious moral crime because shortly after ascending the throne, he forced the prime minister to commit suicide. That is the equivalent of killing his father. This would have made Tang Taizong look like a saint! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skylee Posted December 24, 2004 at 12:06 PM Report Share Posted December 24, 2004 at 12:06 PM My first thought was "does it matter?". But now I see that you just want to make Simon Li look like a saint. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yonglan Posted December 24, 2004 at 09:06 PM Report Share Posted December 24, 2004 at 09:06 PM Who is Simon Li? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skylee Posted December 24, 2004 at 10:48 PM Report Share Posted December 24, 2004 at 10:48 PM Simon Li = Li Shimin = Tang Taizong Sorry I thought everyone understood it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yonglan Posted December 25, 2004 at 12:23 AM Report Share Posted December 25, 2004 at 12:23 AM That's interesting. Are there any other historical figures who've been posthumously given English names? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skylee Posted December 25, 2004 at 12:29 AM Report Share Posted December 25, 2004 at 12:29 AM Oh yeah . Johnny Kong, for example, for 孔仲尼, Jimmy (子美) for 杜甫. I've heard people call 鰲拜 O'Brian. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yonglan Posted December 25, 2004 at 12:49 AM Report Share Posted December 25, 2004 at 12:49 AM Anyway, bhchao, is this something you read or just an idea? How could we ever answer such a question? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yonglan Posted December 25, 2004 at 12:52 AM Report Share Posted December 25, 2004 at 12:52 AM Skylee, those are great. If you think of any more, please add them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhchao Posted December 25, 2004 at 08:14 AM Author Report Share Posted December 25, 2004 at 08:14 AM Yonglan, that is one of the alleged reasons Qin Shi Huang did away with the prime minister, for having an affair with his mother while she was a concubine and the possibility that he was a "bastard". Qin Shi Huang was said to be so enraged by it. It is in the history books and also in the movie Emperor and the Assassin. Skylee, I was just teasing. Don't be too serious. If Qin Shi Huang really was illegitimate, then that means 呂不韋 was his father and his doing away with the prime minister would constitute a serious offense (at least in the Confucian sense) since that would be killing his father. But given his record towards Confucians, he probably didn't care or didn't know much about Confucian values. However you do not have to be a Confucian to know about the moral offense of doing away with one's father. I never let my positive bias towards an individual prevent myself from accessing the negative truth, nor let a negative bias prevent me from accessing the positive truth. Knowledge is power, but truth is divine. That's interesting, Simon Li. I thought you were referring to some movie star in Hong Kong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yonglan Posted December 25, 2004 at 10:38 PM Report Share Posted December 25, 2004 at 10:38 PM then that means 呂不韋 was his father and his doing away with the prime minister would constitute a serious offense (at least in the Confucian sense) since that would be killing his father. Oedipus Rex. But given his record towards Confucians, he probably didn't care or didn't know much about Confucian values. I don't know anything about this book, http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/product-description/0231104316/104-0605769-8816709?%5Fencoding=UTF8&n=507846 but the reviews and info on Amazon are interesting. It's got positive reviews from Nivison and Mote. Of course, that period isn't Mote's specialty. Anyone read this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhchao Posted December 29, 2004 at 03:29 AM Author Report Share Posted December 29, 2004 at 03:29 AM Here is one source referring to Lu as the First Emperor's father. At first I did not believe the story when I heard about it in Emperor and the Assassin. But after investigating further, there might be some credibility to Lü being Ying Zheng's father. http://www.mdln.hws.edu/chinese/huang/mdln312/supplementary/shihuangdi.html "....She was Lü's personal favorite, but he would do anything to keep his "precious commodity" happy and dependent on him, so he agreed. He and the girl managed to conceal from Zi Chu the fact that she already was pregnant by Lü, and when a boy baby was born Zi Chu accepted him as his own son. Thus, Sima Qian relates, Lü Buwei was the real father of the future First Emperor." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HashiriKata Posted June 14, 2007 at 08:20 PM Report Share Posted June 14, 2007 at 08:20 PM Just finished watching "The Emperor and the Assassin" (for the 1st time ) and I enjoyed it. It's subdued in colours but serious in intent and clearly has a story line. Yes, Qin Shi Huang in the film does behave like a real "bastard"! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian_Lee Posted June 26, 2007 at 01:33 AM Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 at 01:33 AM Actually the story that led to the birth of Qin Shi Huang is so XXXXX-rated that readers like studentyoung would definitely object discussion. I wonder how come Bhchao hasn't heard about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian_Lee Posted June 26, 2007 at 07:51 PM Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 at 07:51 PM When we talked about the love/hate rivalry between Qin Shi Huang and Lu, we can't help but also drag in another key figure -- Mr. 繆毒 -- into discussion. However, 繆毒 is always labelled as 大陰人 in many history books. But how can we explain 大陰人 in this forum without objection? We'd better forget about the topic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and select your username and password later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.