Jump to content
Chinese-Forums
  • Sign Up

Curiosity of pinyin writing rules


Johnny20270

Recommended Posts

Hi, I have a question on use of pinyin.

As we know most syllables are a combination of an initial (columns headings of a pinyin table) and a final (row headings of a pinyin table). However, some syllables have no initials (e.g. an). I see that some rules apply to pinyin when the final begins a i, u or ü. These being (not limited to).

if the final begins with an i, it is replaced with a y

if the final begins with an u, it is replaced with a w

if the final begins with an ü, it is replaced with yu

For example, a word like wenyan so made up of written combination of un+ian and because un is an abbreviation of uen, therefore wenyan = uenian. As I understand it the purpose of these changes are to avoid potential confusion, e.g. uenian, so could be interpreted as uen-ian or uen-i-an or u-en-i-an.

All this makes sense, however, when potentially other (2 or 3) syllable pinyin exists and has the potential for confusion, a is used to separate the pinyin, e.g. Xi’an to distinguish it from xian

So my question is this: why not write wenyan as simply uen’ian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

because pinyin was made based on latin.

Nah, it is because /w/ and /j/ are glides and tend to drift into consonant territory in some circumstances in all languages, simply by the way they are vocalised.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glide_%28linguistics%29

Latin just had the same issue with writing it down as Chinese and most other languages, that's all.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

That is the funniest thing I've read all week.

http://en.wikipedia....tion_of_Chinese

for your reference. you can look up the creation of pinyin.

If you read that again, (not that Wikipedia is reliable source for anything), you will see it only refers to the use of the "Latin Alphabet" in Pinyin. It does not discuss Pinyin following any rules of Latin.

Given that scores of languages around the world use variations on the Latin alphabet, there is nothing surprising about it, really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not that Wikipedia is reliable source for anything

Actually its one of the best sources for many fields in my view. I regularly check it for computer science, finance, mathematics (my areas) and it beats a lot of dedicated websites. Thanks to all the helpful geeks and nerds :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

best != reliable

It contains a lot of useful information, but at the same time it's almost entirely editable (with the exception of certain locked topics) so at any given time what you are reading may be correct or it may be the ramblings of whoever decided to just make an edit.

Wikipedia itself acknowledges that it is not a reliable primary source, which is why it asks people to provide citations to reliable sources or risk having edits removed.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wikipedia (and related sites like wiktionary, etc.) is as reliable as it gets on the internet. There is nothing "more reliable" on the net per se.

That said, everything on the Internet must be approached with a good dose of skepticism, including wikipedia. If you do that, and check the primary sources linked in the article, you'll find it a fantastic resource for getting the gist of things :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and select your username and password later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Click here to reply. Select text to quote.

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...