Jump to content
Chinese-forums.com
Learn Chinese in China

Are the aspects of Chinese people when considering history different from that of Occidentals?


Recommended Posts

  • New Members
Xie Daochi

-This has been posted on Hellotalk, with the account'赵隽祺', which is my own account. While this is a new version with several sentences corrected and some new contents. 

 

When Chinese people are reading about history, the points we focus on is really different from the points people from occidental countries focus on - Chinese people usually consider bureaucracy politics and literature as the most important aspects because these are the traditional focus of historians in ancient time, and that China has been with a complex bureaucracy system since Zhou Dynasty. While people from occidental countries usually consider rulers and scientists more important. For example, as for Northern Song Dynasty, Bao Zheng(包拯) who was an official famous of his justice, rectitude, clean and fearless towards the dignitaries has been one of the most well-known ancient Chinese people till nowadays. There are tons of films, operas and dramas about him and he has been a symbol of justice in Chinese people's heart. While another person named Su Song(苏颂) who is famous among the foreign researchers of the history of Song Dynasty because of his achievement in astronomy is hardly known in China.

 

Another thing I woud like to mention is about why literature is also considered important in the history of China. In my opinion, during the ancient time, the sbjects weren't that seperated. People used to consider all the humanities as writing and the comprehension of 'Dao'(道). So in China, the non-specialized historians used to change something in their writing about history to make it more approaching to 'Dao'(道, could be considered as a synonym of 'moral principle'. According to what I found on Chinese internet, this behavior of 'content changing' started also in Northern Song Dynasty, from a scholar named Liu Chang, 刘敞). Also, according to Confucianism, an educated man should 'join the officialdom'(入仕) to achieve their political dream - the ruling like Yao(尧) and Shun(舜) who are two rulers according to ancient legend of the time before Xia Dynasty. Actually people during that time were just using it as a symbol of their political dreams.

 

These are just my views as a Chinese and as an anthropology student in the future. What about you? I will be really glad to see your comments! 
 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Site Sponsors:
Pleco for iPhone / Android iPhone & Android Chinese dictionary: camera & hand- writing input, flashcards, audio.
Study Chinese in Kunming 1-1 classes, qualified teachers and unique teaching methods in the Spring City.
Learn Chinese Characters Learn 2289 Chinese Characters in 90 Days with a Unique Flash Card System.
Hacking Chinese Tips and strategies for how to learn Chinese more efficiently
Popup Chinese Translator Understand Chinese inside any Windows application, website or PDF.
Chinese Grammar Wiki All Chinese grammar, organised by level, all in one place.

anonymoose

I'm not a specialist in history by any means. In my opinion though, it seems that in China, the way to study any subject and what to study is pre-mandated by the authorities, and any deviation from what is considered to be "correct" is wrong. The fact that, as far as history is concerned, people concentrate on bureaucracy, politics and literature, may just be what is generally accepted (although, apart from literature perhaps), I don't see that this diverges greatly from a Western handling of history.

In the West (or UK at least), academics are encouraged to do their own research, come up with their own theories and opinions, and even challenge the established consensus. This is what I would say is the biggest difference. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Another problem with this sort of thing is it's based on flawed assumptions. The Western historical tradition includes quite a lot of church history, for example, as it was often in the monasteries and so forth it was getting recorded. You might get the impression that people were more concerned with how to calculate the date of Easter than who was king going off some of the sources we have.

Then on into the present, does the Annales school only look at rulers and scientists? Are the plays about Thomas More's conflict with his king not in the same order? Does no-one pay any attention to classical literature in the West? It's often one of the few sources we have for certain events and periods.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and select your username and password later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Click here to reply. Select text to quote.

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...