Jump to content
  • Sign Up

"构” and “解”


Recommended Posts

Dear friends,

I cannot understand what do "构” and “解” mean in this sentence


Do you have any idea?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree that "构" is 结构、构造;but "解, I think, should be understood as "化解、瓦解". It is here the opposite meaning of "强化" in the following line.

So 解 here is " to weaken, to disintegrate"

Also, both "构” and “解”are used with quotation marks. It means that they are just imagery use.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree that "构" is 结构、构造;but "解, I think, should be understood as "化解、瓦解".

I have a different opinion. Since the argument in the first part says 我们认为这一结构解决方案,(the original 使 a typo, I guess)代表着建筑内在逻辑体系的“构”没有被“解”掉,it means that the structure is not destroyed or de-constructed(拆解 ), though it may have been remodeled or something else. Therefore, it is followed directly by an emphasis to stress that 這個結構解決方案 is rather a reinforcement and respect (强化和尊重) to the original concept of structure. So the conclusion goes :这种努力使“水立方”真正成为建筑而不是雕塑。 建築 basically is related to the concept of 'structure' while 雕塑是創作者將不符合其藝術創作概念去除(de-, remove)的過程. I agree with monto that you can read 解 here as 瓦解, but I doubt it can mean 化解(resolved), which is a total different concept of 瓦解or 拆解.

Hope it helps!:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and select your username and password later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Click here to reply. Select text to quote.

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...