Jump to content
Learn Chinese in China

Question about Wu Sangui


Recommended Posts

I'm very curious about the figure of Wu Sangui in the Chinese historiography and in common view.

In 1644 A.D. he permitted the Manchurian Army to enter in imperial territory, hoping that they would liberate the capital from the rebelleous forces. Every of us knows what happened next: the Qing didn't move from the capital and became the imperial dynasty. Wu Sangui became a Qing general, then he revolted and tried to repel the foreign dominators.

I would to know how he is considered in Chinese historical tradition: as a betrayer ( an oriental Judas), an hero that understood when the previous dynasty lost the Heaven Mandate, just an opportunist or whatever...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Site Sponsors:
Pleco for iPhone / Android iPhone & Android Chinese dictionary: camera & hand- writing input, flashcards, audio.
Study Chinese in Kunming 1-1 classes, qualified teachers and unique teaching methods in the Spring City.
Learn Chinese Characters Learn 2289 Chinese Characters in 90 Days with a Unique Flash Card System.
Hacking Chinese Tips and strategies for how to learn Chinese more efficiently
Popup Chinese Translator Understand Chinese inside any Windows application, website or PDF.
Chinese Grammar Wiki All Chinese grammar, organised by level, all in one place.

I think Wu Sangui was a historical person and the commentary of him are anfractuous.

Many kinds of opinion exist in academe. In army management, he was an excellent general, his " GuanNing TieQi" was a powerful army and less failed on the battlefield. In the love, he was the delegate of romantic and loyal. He loved Ms. Chen Yuanyuan all the while. On the other hand, as a official of Ming dynasty, of course, he was a rebel. For Qing dynasty, contrarily, he was a meritorious general for beginning of the Qing.

This was the history of Wu Sangui full of disputed and dramatic...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whether he was a traitor is debatable. But he was certainly a flipflopper whose actions were dictated by his own interests. The most probable motive for him letting the Qing armies past Shanhaiguan was to help himself become emperor, rather than a genuine desire to see the Qing takeover China.

It's like a host inviting his guests to dinner and once the dinner is over, the guests unexpectedly never leave the house.

And had he not killed the last Ming pretender in Burma, he would have had credibility in his Three Feudatories revolt against Kangxi later on. Killing the last Ming inheritor destroyed his credibility when he claimed he wanted to restore the Ming during the Three Feudatories revolt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and select your username and password later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Click here to reply. Select text to quote.

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Create New...