johanna Posted March 19, 2009 at 10:05 AM Report Share Posted March 19, 2009 at 10:05 AM "The Chinese expression for IPR protection has only been in dictionaries since 2000" an article in China Daily (19 Oct 2007) says. Is there an expression for IPR protection except for the widely used 保护知识产权? Such a long expression cannot be in dictionaries, can it? Much obliged, Johanna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
renzhe Posted March 19, 2009 at 11:59 AM Report Share Posted March 19, 2009 at 11:59 AM Why not? It's much shorter than "Intellectual property rights protection". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hidden12345 Posted March 19, 2009 at 02:13 PM Report Share Posted March 19, 2009 at 02:13 PM 1.) property is a type of right. Saying "property rights" is a tautology, like saying "sufficient enough" or something equally redundant. 2.) 知识产权 is a term used in the mainland. Taiwan law uses the term 智慧产权 instead. The point: translations are subjective. 3.) re: dictionary. While IP has been a cause of litigation in the US as early as the 1800's, it wasn't until the later 20th century when it really became codified into a set of statutes. Further, China has never been, and still isn't as far as I'm concerned, a 法治 country; therefore, its no surprise that the IP black letter law took so long to hit the books over here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and select your username and password later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.