Jump to content
Chinese-forums.com
Learn Chinese in China

race vs contest


Kenny同志
 Share

Recommended Posts

I was watching a documentary on two Japanese war criminals who started two 杀人竞赛s during the 1930s and was curious to know its equivalent in English. I thought that “killing race” would be fine but doing a lookup in Google Books returned only one result, far fewer than the number of hits of “killing contest”.

So is “killing race” incorrect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Site Sponsors:
Pleco for iPhone / Android iPhone & Android Chinese dictionary: camera & hand- writing input, flashcards, audio.
Study Chinese in Kunming 1-1 classes, qualified teachers and unique teaching methods in the Spring City.
Learn Chinese Characters Learn 2289 Chinese Characters in 90 Days with a Unique Flash Card System.
Hacking Chinese Tips and strategies for how to learn Chinese more efficiently
Popup Chinese Translator Understand Chinese inside any Windows application, website or PDF.
Chinese Grammar Wiki All Chinese grammar, organised by level, all in one place.

I think a race should have a well defined objective, and the competition is to see who can be first to reach that objective. In other words, the time is the variable.

A contest, on the other hand, sounds more like a competition to see who can get the highest achievement within a set time. In other words, the achievement (the score) is the variable.

That's what it seems like to me, anyway, just thinking about it cursorily.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a joke, Kenny. this thread has diverged from topic since post 5, on the matter of whether 'clear' refers to a person or something that the person is talking or thinking about, i.e. whether it's better to say "that's clear" or "I'm clear". There has been some disagreement, and I think both sides have given perfectly legitimate examples. 'Transparent' has the same literal meaning as 'clear', and a figurative meaning that is very similar (honest and open, rather than understandable). I was using it in a way that refers to the person, rather than the thing.

I hope I have made myself perfectly clear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and select your username and password later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Click here to reply. Select text to quote.

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...