Jump to content
Chinese-Forums
  • Sign Up

Review: Suceed in Learning Chinese in 30 days


taijiphoenix

Recommended Posts

Thanks for the review. When I was learning Korean, I was getting frustrated with the textbook I was studying, and switched to a book that just taught phrases and had substitution drills. I actually found that more enjoyable and useful at the beginning level, and then could look up grammar points as needed in the textbook. So I can definitely see the value in a book such as this.

I think after all these reviews are over my I'm going to have to get another bookshelf..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a side note, why do authors/publishers of foreign language learning materials continue to insist on naming products "learn [language] in [n≤90] days"? To me, that's a flat out lie. It's false advertising, and it puts me off buying learning materials that (for all I know) could actually be quite good.

 

 

I 100% agree with this. I don't know how a publisher, in good conscience, can make this kind of assertion. I suppose the problem lies with the buyers of such products because if they didn't buy products making these claims, then publishers wouldn't do it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Demonic, I think it depends what you mean by learn a language. If you mean to just be able to conduct basic business in the target language then a month is probably more than you need. Now, obviously, the quality of the language you're using is going to be poor, but you'd be able to communicate your basic needs.

 

The point there is that it's definitely realistic to get to a point where you're able to learn the rest from locals within that 90 days. And no number of days is sufficient to completely learn a language on every level, even writers like Shakespeare never completely master their language.

 

The main issue is that people have varied notions of what it means to learn a language and often times the standard is unreasonably high. I'm a native English speaker, but I'm not completely fluent in every possible aspect of the language, but I do have the grammatical structures and vocabulary to discuss a huge number of possible topics.

 

@lechuan, those kind of books tend to be the ones that I prefer to use as they actually lead to fluency and an understanding of how the language functions. That's not to say that there aren't other good ways of going about it, but substitution drill books more closely mirror the way that most people use their native language.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 I don't know how a publisher, in good conscience, can make this kind of assertion. I suppose the problem lies with the buyers of such products because if they didn't buy products making these claims, then publishers wouldn't do it.

((Benny Lewis))

 

 

Thanks for the very honest and informative review, it sounds pretty good!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The main issue is that people have varied notions of what it means to learn a language and often times the standard is unreasonably high.

I think the issue here is that sometimes the standard is unreasonably low.

 

An additional problem in this particular case - the book's title mentions "30 days", and it has 30 chapters. So that's 1 chapter to learn a day, which is already pretty ambitious unless the chapters are very short, but you're not just going to learn it, you're going to "succeed in learning" it. To me, that means learning it sufficiently well that you won't unlearn it (学会).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I'm OK with "learn [language] in xx days" books.   They provide a structured approach to learning and a specific goal.  And they SHOULD spell out how you can expect to be communicating at the end of the XX days. Realistically, will anyone expect fluency in a single book and within 30,60,90 days?      But your points are well taken, this sort of title can be abused as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I borrowed the French version from the library so I can add a few comments.

There are no grammar or cultural explanations, or even pinyin table or basic character stroke order or whatever.

The principle of the book is to give bunches of words and sentences used in daily situations, with a picture for each.
The CD has MP4 videos showing all the pictures while the sound is playing.
Some parts of each chapter have slower audio, while some have faster (to my ear, native speed) audio, which is nice.

The audio is Chinese only (no English or French). This is quite common for Chinese textbooks, but for this type of vocabulary+sentences book, it's rather more of a drawback: if you wanted to practice with the audio only à la FSI/Pimsleur/Glossika (or à la "learn in your car", eh wulfgar), you're out of luck.
On the other hand since the videos show the pictures, you could manage with that I suppose, at least for the simpler sentences. If you want to get MP3s you have to separate the audio track from the video yourself.

You're expected to practice everything and somehow learn Chinese through immersion like children do: the Chinese title is 语感中文. That's why all the sentences are about daily tasks or activities, with a heavy emphasis on 1st person sentences.
There are no substitution exercises (unlike "301 sentences" books) but the book encourages you to do those with a tutor or teacher.
You could also practice the sentences by yourself with a Glossika approach, which is what I intend to do.

Since the character in the pictures is female, the book teaches some gender oriented sentences like "我去美容院化妆。" But male oriented sentences are missing. This is a minor drawback, there are not many sentences of this type.
Also, the book was designed for Americans, for instance there is a reference to 感恩节 (oddly translated as "Action de grâce"). Again this seems a minor issue.

I found the French translations globally adequate but clearly not native.
In some instance a few translations are clearly wrong: for instance the picture shows a bread toasting machine but the translation is about an oven.
This is annoying as it means I can't trust the translations... I might end up checking some words in the dictionary and/or skipping some sentences.

I agree that this book is not for self-studying beginners. But it can be useful if you have the basics already and want to learn more everyday vocabulary and sentences.
For some people, studying the book in two passes might be a good idea (first the shorter and slower words and sentences, then the faster sentences of the last part of each chapter).

Lastly, about the 30 days: this is mentioned mainly on the jacket of the book. Looks like a different person designed that...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and select your username and password later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Click here to reply. Select text to quote.

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...